Project and payroll-period context
Keep the covered project and payroll end date attached to the records being reviewed.
Keep the project, payroll period, worker review, and correction evidence organized before using New York’s electronic reporting workflow.
Project registration context, payroll end dates, contractor responsibility, due dates, and corrections belong in one repeatable process—not a one-off form at project close.
Keep project registration context, payroll end dates, worker review, and correction evidence together before using the statewide submission system.
Keep the covered project and payroll end date attached to the records being reviewed.
Review supplied wage requirements, classifications, hours, fringe, and incomplete records before submission.
Organize each reporting period around the state portal cadence instead of rebuilding context each time.
Retain the issue, evidence, resolution, and replacement record as the workflow evolves.
Identify the covered project, contractor, registration context, and reporting period.
Run deterministic checks and surface contextual exceptions for human review.
Correct the source data and retain the evidence behind each decision.
Use the reviewed payroll in New York's electronic submission workflow.
Validation boundaryNew York compliance rules are not fully evaluated. The reviewer must establish schedule applicability, supplements, overtime and reporting requirements. The diagnostic does not register projects, monitor due dates or submit records to NYSDOL.
Use a WH-347, CSV, XLSX, or payroll export.
Rules handle arithmetic; contextual review handles ambiguity.
Clean entries disappear into the background.
What did WagePilot find?Why was it flagged?What evidence did it use?
You are shown the reasoning—not asked to trust a black box.The agent does the work. You keep the authority.
Recurring certified payroll for your own workforce.
Multiple projects and subcontractor review.
Higher project and submission volume.
No. The launch workflow starts with a PDF, CSV, or XLSX export. Your payroll system remains the source.
No. The diagnostic does not file anything. Material decisions and regulated submissions remain with you.
The item is surfaced with review limitations, supporting evidence, and a recommended next action for human review.
Yes. Findings show the source, supplied rule evidence, calculation where applicable, review limitations, and next action.
Code performs deterministic comparisons against wage rules you supply. The MVP does not automatically identify the legally applicable determination.
Files are held only while the review runs and are deleted when it finishes. PDF files are sent to OpenAI for structured extraction and the temporary uploaded file is deleted after processing. Unless your organization turns on the optional, encrypted keeping of originals in Settings, WagePilot does not keep payroll files.
Yes. Start with one payroll and one project without creating an account or entering a credit card.
The initial diagnostic runs a narrow supplied-rules review. California, Illinois, and New York pages describe their reporting workflows, but WagePilot does not claim complete 50-state rules or filing support.
Get a useful initial review before choosing a plan. No credit card required.